|
![Confessions of a Dangerous Mind]()
Confessions of a Dangerous Mind (2002)
IMDB rating: 7.10
Plot: Television made him famous, but his biggest hits happened off screen. “Confessions of a Dangerous Mind” is the story of a legendary showman’s double life - television producer by day, CIA assassin by night. At the height of his TV career, Chuck Barris was recruited by the CIA and trained to become a covert operative. Or so Barris said.
|
Online Movies World
Directors: Clooney George
Actors: Hauer Rutger,Clooney George,Roberts Julia,Rockwell Sam,Westley Jennifer Rae,Clark Dick,Cera Michael,Tucker Sean,Hirsh David Julian,Pitt Brad,Damon Matt,Biography,Crime,Drama,Thriller,
How many nuclear weapons will be needed to destroy India?
US intelligence report says Pakistan has 60 nukes. India report estimates them 90-120. But on one point, both ‘ve agreed - Pakistan is expanding it’s nuke arsenal.
Now that’s confusing me ! As per my knowledge, 60 nukes are much more than enough to eliminate India from world map. Then, if I frame India as the target of those nukes, I can’t understand why Pakistan is increasing the no of nukes. After all , nukes are not an weapon to be used in conventional war ! After Hiroshima & Nagasaki, nukes were never used. Though we’ve seen many dire situations - US lost in Vietnam, & USSR in Afghanistan;but nukes were never used, as international politics would always come in path.
Pakistan should,ve improve it’s conventional arsenal, which they can use against India if needed. But why are they increasing nukes, which is not a reliable option in war ?
Now here I put some question - is it not possible that some ppl in Pakistan are still working for A. Q. Khan ? Even after his confession on his role in Nuke-smuggling, Pak authority ‘ve always maintained a soft stand on him. That implies he has a strong lobby in Pakistan in his support. Is this lobby still carrying out the ‘job’ for AQ Khan ? There are many countries who want possession of nukes, but can’t do it for technological-economic constraints, or international pressure. Is Pakistan acting as a ’supplier’ for these countries, like the supplied nuke technology to N. Korea ?
Another point comes in my mind- are some of the nukes ‘reserved’ for radical Islamic groups ? Though ppl may argue that Pak army will never intentionally hand-over nukes to the terrorists(it may be dangerous for Pak itself), &now Pak army is fighting against Taliban; so they will negate such speculations. But I’ve some doubt -
1) A US reporter ‘ve written in his book that once AQ Khan himself with two fellow scientists met with Laden on possible ‘deal’ of nukes. Is it impossible that someone in Pak authority secretly smuggle nukes to the radicals.
2) one point should be noted that the same Taliban has declared US, UK, Israel , India & many other states as enemies. Remember that radicals always get good support from Pak ppl. I’ve seen many processions carried out by Pak ppl in support of radicals. When US attacked Afghanistan, many Pakistani went to Afghanistan to fight alongside Talibans. I want to know, do those Pak ppl even now express different view on this stand of Talibans, with Talibans’ battle against Pak govt ? I it’s yes, then it implies that they are not entirely against Talibans’ ideology. Such ppl are present in Pak army & administration. Then, some of them may smuggle nuke to the radicals.
It depends on the power of the bombs used as they vary greatly. A small fission bomb may be of even 0.1 kT of TNT but a big thermonuclear bomb has no such limit. It can be even 10,000 times more powerful than a 10 kT Fission bomb too. It was reported in 1992 that when Soviet Union fragmented , Kazakhstan had large number of all types of nuclear weapons & 45 big missiles of thermonuclear weapons were missing , being so much powerful that a single one can destry India’s big states like Rajasthan & Maharastra. Those missiles were reportedly reached Pakistan. Pakistan has uranium enrichment methods of many types but the cheapest one being used is NOT of Dr. A Q Khan rather, the one developed by another scientist Dr. Husain, by enriching uranium upto 100% in ONE step in the cheapest Liquid System, kept a top state secret, not known to even USA. Dr Khan’s method became >500 times costlier, so discarded by Pakistan & that’s why, that was probably sold to other nations for minting money only as for all other nations that is still the next cheapest one. That simple method needs a simple technical trick, never clicked in other minds but if that is told to anyone, one would say he/she too could have done easily but that tricky point didn’t strike his/her mind. Plutonium bombs are smaller & handy but their powers are low & their costs are much higher. Judge yourself . All these things are well reported in media.
When Dr. Khan became redundent & useless for nuclear fuel b coz of Dr. Husain, he, being extra brilliant was given missile development work which he did too efficiently & is still doing, not a crime at all. He is no longer involved in nuclear projects after 1976 & was all the time busy in missile projects only.
A nuclear war cannot be won by anybody b coz by destroying enemiy’s land one makes that highly radioactive unusable for billions of years to come totally. What is the use of using such a weapon which gives you such useless land of the enemy forever ? Moreover, NO Neighbour will ever use nuclear weapons as the radioactive nuclear fall outs will reach there destroying the air, ground water & sea water completely for billions of years destroying that nation too. Foolish people don’t know that if at all nuclear weapons are used in Indian subcontinent, thick black clouds will remain on the entire land for many years & the sun will not at all be visible. Radioactive fallouts destroying human civilisation for billions of years to come will be certainly there. Entire Himalaya will be stripped of snow forever & all rivers will vanish too additionally. What is the fault of other smaller neighbours which too will be affected like Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Maldives, Sri Lanka & Afghanistan who have nothing to do with Indo-Pak dispute.
Nuclear weapons possession can be used at most as a credible deterrent only for any majour armed conflict, nothing more than that. Nuclear weapon possession actually prevented escalation of small Kargil Conflict into a full scale Indo-Pak War & in 2001 - 2002 too it prevented even start of the possible war. It is said that it prevented wars in 1984, 1987, 1988 &1990 too earlier as disclosed by late Ghulam Ishaaq Khan, former Pakistan’s president & most silent shrewd bureaucrate responsible for development of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons speedily. He was in bureaucracy for 50 years called a ’silent water’. It is said that his DANDA(stick) worked very much for development of all nuclear projects as he was visiting all laboratories to see the progress every week.
I DO NOT ANSWER WITHOUT STUDY & KNOWLEDGE FOR ARGUMENT SAKE.
Is your question a question or speech needing discussions of 100 pages ? Most of Indian TV news channels ask lengthy questions to the opposite persons like a big speech where central point is obscured badly. They don’t even know how to ask a question. There is a difference between question-answer session & a ‘discussion’. Most of people ignore this point & convert that into an ‘altercation’ on Y/A.
Well Wisher | Jun 08, 2009
even 1000 and crores of PAKI nuke’s can not destroy INDIA.
shiv | Jun 01, 2009
You have brought out very pertinent points. It is all politics.
khayum p | Jun 01, 2009
Even 1 is sufficient i guess.
Why 1 ? the fear of use is enough.
And if it is ever used… on India or any other place, (place does not matter) , it is gonna destroy the entire world.
The third world war, that the nostradamus spoke of might come true.
Everybody is afraid ! Fear is the only thing that can protect now
baba | Jun 01, 2009
The U.S. and U.S.S.R. stockpiled thousands of nukes to destroy eachother during the cold war but they didn’t need that many either. It’s a political/immaturity thing. If you’re about to fight someone and they have a bullet in a clip, you’re gonna put two in yours.
Ears | Jun 01, 2009
I was reading a report on India’s defence capabilities. And according to that report at the most, Pakistan can drop a nuclear missile at the max at Mumbai and within 90 seconds, India has capabilities to vanish Pakistan from world map. Thus Pakistan will never ever dare to do any such notorious acts. These are just political acts.
LONG LIVE INDIAN REPUBLIC (MS) | Jun 01, 2009
the nuke no.s 61 to 90 or 120 are managed by non-pakistani forces, with the fullest manipulative powers in India and hence no worry;
any way, this nuke situation is to create war hysteria in both India and Pakistan, but war threat for India is perceived from pakistan and for pakistan, within from itself;
it has been found good,even by mohandas during the struggle for freedom for India, the division between Hindus and Muslims, enabling mohandas from concentrating on the mainstrugglee, leaving the detractors to fight among themselves on Hindu-muslim basis, without disturbing the main plank;
even now, congress lead by sonia or any one , following this principle, make use of the Hindu-muslim warring factions within India , to remain in and retain political power , even by arranging so many terror attacks from pakistan, bangladesh and so many ambedkar,naxal,maoist, , raj takre,karunanithi,lalu,paswan,mulayam,kalyan etc from within and dawud, chota, bangladeshi illegal migrants from both in and outside india ; all these, more on the aggressive side and JNU,marxists,m f hussain, suraiya etc from within on the intellectual side.
In conclusion, the threat from Pak to India is eternal as there is no possibility of decimating congress.
kalai | Jun 01, 2009
It is not nuclear weapons that will destroy us but corruption.
maitree | Jun 02, 2009
i dont think Pakistan will ever nuke india as long as we muslims are here..
8thwonder back with a vengeance | Jun 02, 2009